Section 178: Counterfeiting Coins, Stamps, Currency Notes or Bank Notes

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter IX: Of Offences Relating to Coin, Currency & Stamps • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter IX: Of Offences Relating to Coin, Currency & Stamps
Court of Session
Non-Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 231, 232, 255, 489A IPC

BNSS First Schedule Legal Classification

Procedural Trial, Bail & Arrest Mandate under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
Official BNSS Schedule I
Offence / Provision Statutory Punishment Bail Status Cognizance Trial Jurisdiction Old IPC Equivalent
Section 178 BNS
Counterfeiting Coins, Stamps, Currency Notes or Bank Notes
Imprisonment for life, or imprisonment extending to 10 years, and fine. Non-Bailable Cognizable Court of Session Formerly Sec 231, 232, 255, 489A IPC
Statutory classification established under the First Schedule of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. Governs all FIR registrations, bail hearings, and criminal trial jurisdictions in Indian courts.

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 178

Section 178 penalizes counterfeiting coins, government stamps, currency notes, or bank notes, prescribing imprisonment for life, or imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and fine, protecting national sovereign currency.

  • Act of Counterfeiting: Making, printing, minting, or manufacturing fake coins, government revenue stamps, or currency notes resembling genuine currency.
  • Sovereign Monetary Protection: Defends national macroeconomic stability against fake Indian currency notes (FICN) and economic warfare.
  • Extreme Penal Ceiling: Punishable with imprisonment for life or up to ten years imprisonment, and mandatory fine (formerly Sections 231, 255, and 489A IPC).
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Kerala v. Mathai Verghese (1986) 4 SCC 746: The Supreme Court held that currency counterfeiting under Section 489A IPC (Section 178 BNS) applies to Indian as well as foreign sovereign currency notes; economic sovereignty demands strict enforcement against counterfeiters.
  • M. Mammutti v. State of Karnataka (1979) 4 SCC 723: Affirmed that counterfeiting requires conscious participation in manufacturing fake notes or coins.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In fake currency racketeering trials, produce the SPMCIL (Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India) or Bank Note Press forensic report: proving differences in watermarks, magnetic ink, and security threads under Section 178 BNS establishes completed counterfeiting.