Section 183: Effacing Writing from Substance Bearing Government Stamp

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter IX: Of Offences Relating to Coin, Currency & Stamps • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter IX: Of Offences Relating to Coin, Currency & Stamps
Magistrate 1st Class
Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 261 IPC

BNSS First Schedule Legal Classification

Procedural Trial, Bail & Arrest Mandate under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
Official BNSS Schedule I
Offence / Provision Statutory Punishment Bail Status Cognizance Trial Jurisdiction Old IPC Equivalent
Section 183 BNS
Effacing Writing from Substance Bearing Government Stamp
Imprisonment extending to 3 years, or fine, or both. Bailable Cognizable Magistrate 1st Class Formerly Sec 261 IPC
Statutory classification established under the First Schedule of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. Governs all FIR registrations, bail hearings, and criminal trial jurisdictions in Indian courts.

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 183

Section 183 penalizes effacing writing from substance bearing a Government stamp, or removing from a document a stamp used for it, with intent to cause loss to the Government, prescribing imprisonment up to three years, or fine, or both.

  • Stamp Fraud Acts: Effacing writing from a stamped document, or removing an adhesive or judicial stamp from a deed with intent to reuse it.
  • Intent to Defraud Revenue: Done with intent to cause loss to the Government or to deceive any person.
  • Protection of State Stamp Revenue: Penalizes document recycling and court-fee stamp reuse syndicates (formerly Section 261 IPC).
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Maharashtra v. Som Nath Thapa (1996) 4 SCC 659: Examined stamp scam syndicates and the recycling of judicial stamps under penal provisions.
  • Bhupendra Singh v. State of Punjab (1997) 11 SCC 344: Affirmed that intentional fraud on state stamp revenue carries penal liability.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In registry inspections where an advocate's clerk is accused of peeling off court fees, demand a forensic analysis of the adhesive: proving that the stamp was purchased through e-Stamp portals with unique UIN numbers defeats Section 183 BNS allegations.