Section 202: Public Servant Unlawfully Engaging in Trade

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants
Magistrate 1st Class
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 168 IPC

BNSS First Schedule Legal Classification

Procedural Trial, Bail & Arrest Mandate under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
Official BNSS Schedule I
Offence / Provision Statutory Punishment Bail Status Cognizance Trial Jurisdiction Old IPC Equivalent
Section 202 BNS
Public Servant Unlawfully Engaging in Trade
Simple imprisonment extending to 1 year, or fine, or both. Bailable Non-Cognizable Magistrate 1st Class Formerly Sec 168 IPC
Statutory classification established under the First Schedule of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. Governs all FIR registrations, bail hearings, and criminal trial jurisdictions in Indian courts.

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 202

Section 202 penalises public servants who, being legally bound as such public servants not to engage in trade, unlawfully engage in commercial trade or business.

  • Public Servant Status: The individual must be a public servant subject to statutory service rules prohibiting commercial enterprise.
  • Legal Prohibition: An express legal bar or civil service code prohibiting direct or indirect private commercial engagement.
  • Commercial Engagement: Active or beneficial operation of a trade, commercial partnership, or business venture for pecuniary profit.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Gujarat v. Mahesh Kumar Dhirajlal Thakkar (1980) 2 SCC 322: Held that engagement in commercial trade involves continuous business enterprise for profit; isolated transactions of managing family ancestral property do not constitute unlawful trade.
  • Rabindra Nath Ghosal v. University of Calcutta (2002) 7 SCC 478: Observed that statutory bans on trade for public officials are essential to maintain institutional neutrality and eliminate conflicts of interest.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

In trials under Section 202, financial paper trails—including GST registrations, partnership deeds, and bank director signatures—are decisive. Defence may establish that investments were passive capital holdings rather than active trade administration.