Home  /  Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita  /  Section 209

Section 209: Non-Appearance in Response to Proclamation Under Section 84 BNSS

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants
Magistrate 1st Class
Non-Bailable
Cognizable
Formerly Sec 174A IPC
Section 208 All 358 Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 210

BNSS First Schedule Legal Classification

Procedural Trial, Bail & Arrest Mandate under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
Official BNSS Schedule I
Offence / Provision Statutory Punishment Bail Status Cognizance Trial Jurisdiction Old IPC Equivalent
Section 209 BNS
Non-Appearance in Response to Proclamation Under Section 84 BNSS
 Sec 209(a): Imprisonment up to 3 years, or fine, or both; Sec 209(b) (Proclaimed Offender): Imprisonment up to 7 years and fine. Non-Bailable Cognizable Magistrate 1st Class Formerly Sec 174A IPC
Statutory classification established under the First Schedule of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. Governs all FIR registrations, bail hearings, and criminal trial jurisdictions in Indian courts.

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 209

Section 209 penalises non-appearance of an accused person in response to a proclamation issued under Section 84 of the BNSS, 2023 (equivalent to Section 82 of the CrPC, 1973).

  • Proclamation under Section 84 BNSS: A valid statutory proclamation issued against an absconding person by a court of competent jurisdiction.
  • Mandatory Statutory Window: Failure of the proclaimed person to appear at the specified place and time (giving not less than thirty days).
  • Enhanced Penal Category: Enhanced imprisonment of up to 7 years if the proclamation pertains to specified serious or heinous offences.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of M.P. v. Pradeep Sharma (2014) 2 SCC 166: The Supreme Court held that a person against whom a proclamation under Section 82 CrPC has been issued is not entitled to the benefit of anticipatory bail.
  • Lavesh v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2012) 8 SCC 730: Reiterated that an absconder who evades judicial proclamation is disentitled from seeking pre-arrest protection under Section 438 CrPC / Section 482 BNSS.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Prosecution must establish strict adherence to the 30-day timeline and the publication requirements (public reading, affixing at residence and courthouse) under Section 84 BNSS. Any procedural defect in publication vitiates the charge under Section 209.

Section 208 All 358 Sections of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 210