Section 222: Omission to Assist Public Servant when Bound by Law

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita • Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants • Official Statutory Text & Legal Guide

Chapter XI: Of Offences by or Relating to Public Servants
Any Magistrate
Bailable
Non-Cognizable
Formerly Sec 187 IPC

BNSS First Schedule Legal Classification

Procedural Trial, Bail & Arrest Mandate under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
Official BNSS Schedule I
Offence / Provision Statutory Punishment Bail Status Cognizance Trial Jurisdiction Old IPC Equivalent
Section 222 BNS
Omission to Assist Public Servant when Bound by Law
Imprisonment extending to 2 years, or fine, or both. Bailable Non-Cognizable Any Magistrate Formerly Sec 187 IPC
Statutory classification established under the First Schedule of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. Governs all FIR registrations, bail hearings, and criminal trial jurisdictions in Indian courts.

Legal Commentary & Landmark Judgments: Section 222

Section 222 penalises intentional omission to assist a public servant in the execution of their duty when bound by law to render such assistance.

  • Statutory Obligation to Assist: The person is legally bound by express statute to render assistance (e.g., Section 33 or 34 BNSS in suppressing riots or apprehending felons).
  • Lawful Demand: A clear and reasonable demand for assistance made by a public servant.
  • Intentional Refusal: Intentional failure or refusal to assist without reasonable cause.
Key Landmark Precedents:
  • State of Maharashtra v. Laljit Rajshi Shah (2000) 2 SCC 372: Held that penal provisions compelling citizens to assist authorities must be strictly construed and limited to statutory duties expressly specified by law.
  • Emperor v. Ram Sarup AIR 1938 Pat 229: Clarified that a citizen cannot be punished for failure to assist unless the public servant explicitly requested assistance for a recognized statutory emergency.
Courtroom Practice & Strategic Litigation Guidance:

Demonstrate lack of physical capacity, imminent danger to personal life, or absence of an explicit verbal demand from the officer to successfully defend charges under Section 222.